The BBC offers viewers the most usable Video on Demand (VoD) / catch up TV website with its iPlayer service, while Sky’s Sky Player service fails to match other broadcasters in terms of usability, according to new findings released today. The ‘Video on Demand: playing catch up’ report from user experience consultancy, Webcredible, revealed that […]
The BBC offers viewers the most usable Video on Demand (VoD) / catch up TV website with its iPlayer service, while Sky’s Sky Player service fails to match other broadcasters in terms of usability, according to new findings released today.
The ‘Video on Demand: playing catch up’ report from user experience consultancy, Webcredible, revealed that BBC iPlayer is leading major UK broadcasters in the VoD usability stakes with a score of 88 per cent, followed by Scottish broadcaster STV with its STV Player coming in second with 76 per cent. Sky Player on the other hand scored just 55 per cent, with admittedly a more complex commercialised offering, failing to clearly explain its different subscription packages to users on the site.
04/10/2010
The report analysed the VoD / catch up TV services of six of the UK’s major broadcasters against 10 best practice usability guidelines.
The guidelines focused on site and homepage priorities, supporting key user tasks, engagement, and help and support.
Channel Five’s Demand Five service came third in the study, scoring 72 per cent, with Channel Four’s 4oD and ITV’s ITV player finishing fourth and fifth respectively with scores of 68 and 60 per cent.
The average usability score of 69.7 per cent for the VoD websites studied is very respectable when compared to other sectors.
However, while most of the sites fulfilled the basic criteria required for a VoD website, many lost marks for presenting key user tasks in unintuitive ways and for failing to ‘engage’ users effectively.
BBC iPlayer performed well across all guidelines, but both iPlayer and STV Player have a fairly straightforward business proposition where users can watch all programmes for free.
However, user engagement was where most sites dropped points, with ‘providing flexible viewing options’ and ‘engaging audiences with additional features’ finishing as the guidelines with the lowest average scores of three and 2.2 out of five, respectively.
“Despite the overall high scores, it’s surprising that the sites reviewed do not make more of an effort to engage their users, comments Trenton Moss, Director, Webcredible. “The functionality offered by many of the VoD sites is very similar so user engagement is an area where sites can really look to differentiate themselves. This lack of engagement is particularly important for broadcaster VoD to compete with sites like YouTube and new market players such as SeeSaw.”
A full copy of the report can be downloaded from http://www.webcredible.co.uk/vod and you can listen to a podcast discussing the findings at http://www.webcredible.co.uk/vodpodcast.
The 6 VoD websites received the following scores in total, out of 100:
Application Total
BBC iPlayer 88
STV Player 76
Demand Five 72
4oD 68
ITV Player 60
Sky Player 55
Average score 69.7
Methodology
Webcredible analysed the 6 broadcaster Video on Demand websites in August 2010.
Each website was evaluated against 10 best practice guidelines and assigned a score of 0-5 for each guideline, with 5 being the maximum. With 10 guidelines in total, websites were assigned a total Web Usability Index rating out of 50 which was then turned into a percentage.
Source: www.webcredible.co.uk
